The Shifting Sands: China-U.S. Relations, Global Inflation, and the Future of the World Economy

Rishan S. Prasad
6 min readNov 11, 2024

--

China-US Graphic: GT

China and the United States are frequently viewed as both partners and competitors in the global economy since they have two of the biggest economies in the world. The tension between these two countries significantly impacts global trade, inflation trends, and economic stability. As this article examines, The world economy is reshaped by inflationary pressures, economic policies, and geopolitical tensions between the United States and China. Through applying political philosophy, economic theory, and historical precedent, we forecast the possible futures of this crucial international relationship.

The Historical Context of China-U.S. Economic Relations

Beginnings of a Global Partnership

China’s 2001 admission to the World Trade Organization (WTO) was a significant turning point, which sparked economic expansion and a closer integration with the world economy (Ikenberry 2008). The focus of U.S.-China relations was cooperation from 2001 until the early 2010s, during which time both economies benefited from solid trade flows. This era was heavily impacted by neoliberal economic theory, which promotes free markets and little government intervention (Harvey 2007). However, as China’s quick economic rise started threatening the United States’ hegemony in the world economy, the partnership changed from collaboration to wary rivalry. According to the historical theory known as the Thucydides Trap, developed by philosopher and historian Thucydides in his research on the Peloponnesian War, conflict frequently occurs when a new power threatens an established one (Allison 2017). The fundamental tension in the present U.S.-China relationship is encapsulated in this theory.

Economic Theories: Inflation, Trade Deficits, and Currency Manipulation

The Economics of Inflation and Trade

China and the United States have different economic strategies as they struggle with rising inflation. Recent geopolitical tensions, supply chain disruptions, and an expansive fiscal policy have all contributed to inflation in the United States (Blanchard, 2022). Increased production costs brought on by tariffs and restrictions on Chinese imports cause this “cost-push” inflation. Because of centralized control over monetary policy and pricing mechanisms, China’s inflation rate is still relatively low (Wu, 2023). Keynesian economics promotes more significant government intervention to stabilize prices and employment levels and contends that governments can control inflation through fiscal policy (Keynes 1936). China’s strategy has elements of mercantilism, while the United States has relied on Keynesian tools. It prioritizes exports, maintains trade surpluses, and intervenes in foreign exchange markets to protect its currency value (List 1841).

Currency Manipulation and Its Global Implications

China’s regulated currency devaluation in the West is frequently called “currency manipulation.” China maintains competitive prices for its goods on the international market by maintaining the yuan’s depreciation against the dollar. This approach is consistent with theories of exchange rates, which hold that a lower exchange rate creates a trade surplus by promoting exporters while discouraging imports. This manipulation is problematic for the United States since a weaker yuan increases inflation and the trade deficit (Krugman 1990).

Geopolitical and Economic Tensions: A Philosophical Perspective

Realism vs. Liberalism in International Relations

The ancient philosophical conflict between liberalism and realism is reflected in the geopolitical competition between the United States and China. Realism, which prioritizes security and power, implies that countries behave selfishly and distrust one another (Mearsheimer 2001). According to this school of thought, the United States and China might keep arguing as each country tries to maintain its supremacy in the world. Liberalism, on the other hand, places a strong emphasis on interdependence, institutions, and collaboration for mutual gain. According to this perspective, since both sides stand to suffer from open confrontation, the interdependence of the economies of the United States and China should, in theory, foster peace. Constructivist theory, however, adds another level by arguing that ideologies and perceptions influence state action (Wendt 1999). In this case, national identities — the U.S.’s dedication to liberal democracy and China’s emphasis on sovereignty — restrict collaboration.

Current Economic Tensions: Supply Chains and Technological Rivalries

The Chip War and Technology Decoupling

Tensions between the United States and China are centered on technology, as both countries vie for supremacy in fields like artificial intelligence, semiconductor manufacturing, and green technology. By increasing American semiconductor production, protectionist measures like the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 seek to lessen reliance on Chinese technology (U.S. Congress 2022). China’s goal to attain “national rejuvenation” and lessen its need for Western technology includes technical advancement (Xi 2021). Economic nationalism holds that to safeguard national security, nations should give priority to their industries, particularly in vital fields like technology (Friedman 2020). Although this favors the United States in the near term, it also causes inflation by upsetting long-standing supply chains.

Global Inflation and Trade Wars: A Projection

We can anticipate sustained inflationary pressures on a global scale if the United States and China keep moving in this direction of protectionism and economic separation. According to supply-side economic theory, reducing the supply of goods raises prices, and trade restrictions boost prices and consumer expenses (Sowell 2015). Because they rely on Chinese exports and American imports, developing economies — especially those in Southeast Asia and Africa — may see even more severe inflation in this scenario.

Projections and Predictions: Where Are We Headed?

The Likelihood of a Global Economic Shift

According to world-systems theory, the global economic order might change if the United States and China completely decouple (Wallerstein 1974). Trade flows and economic dependencies determine which countries shift from the “core” (wealthier, more industrialized nations) to the “periphery” (poorer nations) in this model. China may further turn toward Russia, Central Asia, and African countries, while the isolated United States may reorient its alliances toward Europe and other Western friends.

Inflation and Economic Stability: A Long-Term Outlook

Changes in the supply chain and higher manufacturing costs could cause inflation in the United States to continue at high levels shortly. The trade gap might widen and lower U.S. export competitiveness if the currency keeps rising. Conversely, if the U.S. market closes, China’s economy might grow more slowly, resulting in deflationary pressures at home and giving it more clout in the “Global South” as it looks for new markets.

The Path Ahead for U.S.-China Relations and Global Stability

The relationship between the U.S. and China will likely continue to shape global economic trends, with significant repercussions for inflation, trade, and economic stability worldwide. By understanding the philosophical and theoretical foundations of their actions, we can better predict future shifts. Whether through intensified rivalry or reluctant cooperation, the decisions made by both nations will be pivotal in determining the future structure of the world economy.

References

Allison, Graham. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017.

Blanchard, Olivier. Fiscal Policy and Inflation: Addressing Current Challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2022.

Friedman, George. The Storm Before the Calm: America’s Discord, the Coming Crisis of the 2020s, and the Triumph Beyond. New York: Anchor, 2020.

Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Ikenberry, G. John. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.

Keynes, John Maynard. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1936.

Krugman, Paul. The Age of Diminished Expectations. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.

Mearsheimer, John J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton, 2001.

Sowell, Thomas. Basic Economics: A Common Sense Guide to the Economy. New York: Basic Books, 2015.

U.S. Congress. CHIPS and Science Act of 2022.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World-System I. New York: Academic Press, 1974.

Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Wu, Jing. “China’s Inflation Control Policies and Their Effectiveness.” Chinese Economic Journal, 2023.

Xi, Jinping. “Speech on National Rejuvenation and Technological Independence.” Beijing, 2021.

--

--

Rishan S. Prasad
Rishan S. Prasad

Written by Rishan S. Prasad

Advocate for climate resilience, legal innovation, and Pacific Island heritage. Law school aspirant with expertise in international relations and human rights.

No responses yet